By: Roarke Clinton
Malpublish
/mal-PUB-lish/
Verb
To violate widely accepted principles of ethical publishing.
To knowingly make available to the public false, misleading, deceptive, inaccurate, uncited, or unattributed content through any media channel, platform, or publication.
To create, disseminate, or promote misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, fake news, or other forms of media that breach ethical publishing standards.
To publish, post, fail to promptly correct, refuse to retract, or allow the publication of content that does not champion all ethical publishing practices.
To undermine public trust, hinder informed decision-making, and contribute to the spread of misinformation by engaging in publishing practices that prioritize sensationalism, ideology, or profit over truth and accuracy.
Origin
Compound of the prefix 'mal-' (meaning bad or wrongful) + 'publish'. This construction is similar to other terms like "malpractice" or "malfunction," where the prefix "mal-" denotes an incorrect or harmful action.
Conjugations
verb: malpublish; 3rd person present: malpublishes; past tense: malpublished; past participle: malpublished; gerund or present participle: malpublishing
Example Sentences
The news outlet was accused of malpublishing when it knowingly allowed the publication of a story containing factual errors, deceiving its audience and eroding trust in the integrity of publicly available information.
The social media platform faced criticism for malpublishing by failing to promptly correct or remove misleading posts that promoted questionable health products, contributing to the spread of misinformation and eroding trust in the integrity of publicly available content.
The research journal malpublished by not retracting a study that was found to have used falsified data, allowing the flawed findings to continue influencing public opinion and eroding trust in the integrity of publicly available scientific information.
The political campaign was guilty of malpublishing when it released an advertisement featuring doctored images and quotes taken out of context, knowingly deceiving voters and eroding trust in the integrity of publicly available political content.
Related Terms and Derivatives
Malpublisher n. - An individual or entity that engages in malpublishing.
Malpublishes v. - Third-person singular present tense of malpublish.
Malpublished v. & a. - Past tense and past participle of malpublish; content that has been published in a way that meets the definition of malpublishing.
Malpublishing v. & n. - The action of engaging in malpublishing; the practice of intentionally publishing false, misleading, or improperly attributed content.
Malpublication n. - An instance of malpublishing: a piece of content that has been malpublished.
Malpublicity n. - The state or quality of being malpublished; the widespread dissemination of malpublished content.
Characteristics
Malpublishing is characterized by deliberate actions that violate the principles of responsible publishing, such as:
Knowingly presenting false or unverifiable claims as factual.
Misrepresenting or distorting information to mislead audiences.
Failing to properly attribute sources or engaging in plagiarism.
Using sensationalist or misleading headlines, images, or other media.
Neglecting to disclose conflicts of interest or biases that may influence the content.
Blurring the lines between news, opinion, advertising, and propaganda.
Refusing to issue timely corrections or retractions when errors are identified.
Allowing the publication or dissemination of content that perpetuates harmful stereotypes, spreads hateful or discriminatory messages, or invades individuals' privacy.
Contributing to the proliferation of misinformation, disinformation, or fake news across any media channel, platform, or publication.
Eroding public trust in the integrity of publicly available content and information.
Synonyms & Antonyms
One of the main reasons for coining the term "malpublish" is the lack of existing words or phrases that capture its precise meaning, leaving a gap in our language. While there are words that describe the various outcomes or consequences of malpublishing, such as "misinform," "deceive," or "mislead," these terms do not encapsulate the specific act of intentionally publishing false, misleading, or improperly attributed content and failing to correct it promptly.
Similarly, there are no direct antonyms for "malpublish" because it describes a specific set of actions rather than a single, easily negatable concept. Words like "inform," "verify," or "fact-check" describe responsible publishing practices that stand in contrast to malpublishing, but they do not function as direct opposites.
The absence of precise synonyms and antonyms for "malpublish" highlights the need for this new term to fill a gap in our language and enable more accurate discussions about the complex issue of misinformation in publishing.
Why "malpublish"
In today's fast-paced digital world, information spreads rapidly across various media channels, platforms, and publications. With this comes the potential for misinformation, disinformation, propaganda, fake news, and other forms of manipulated media to take hold, deceiving audiences and eroding trust in the integrity of publicly available content and information. But what do we call this phenomenon? How do we identify and address the root cause of this problem?
Enter "malpublish" – a groundbreaking term that encapsulates the act of knowingly causing the spread of false, misleading, inaccurate, deceptive, or improperly attributed content. Just as "plagiarize" revolutionized how we talk about copying someone's work without attribution, "malpublish" has the power to transform how we discuss and tackle irresponsible publishing practices.
Think about it: how many times have you encountered a news article that seemed too good (or bad) to be true? Or a social media post that spread misinformation under the guise of facts? These are classic examples of malpublishing – and now, we finally have a word to describe them.
But "malpublish" isn't just a label – it's a powerful tool for change. By calling out malpublishing when we see it, we can hold publishers and platforms accountable for the content they disseminate. We can demand clarity, accuracy, and transparency in the information we consume. And we can work together to create a more informed, more discerning society.
Practical Applications
The term "malpublish" has a wide range of practical applications across various fields, as outlined in the comprehensive white paper on "malpublishing."
For journalists and reporters, "malpublish" serves as a crucial reminder to verify sources, fact-check information, and ensure the accuracy of their reporting. In the realm of social media, platforms can use "malpublish" as a guideline to develop algorithms that flag and remove content that violates standards of responsible publishing. In academia, educators can use "malpublish" to teach students about the importance of proper attribution, the dangers of plagiarism, and the need to critically evaluate the sources they use in their research. And in the legal field, "malpublish" can provide a framework for developing policies and regulations that hold publishers and platforms accountable for the spread of misinformation.
Instructions to Avoid Malpublishing
So, how can content creators, publishers, platforms, and everyday users avoid malpublishing? The book "Malpublishers" provides in-depth guidance, but here are some practical tips:
Always fact-check your sources and verify the accuracy of information before publishing or sharing.
Clearly distinguish between facts, opinions, and speculation in your content.
Provide proper attribution for any quotes, data, or multimedia elements used in your work.
Be transparent about any potential conflicts of interest or biases that may influence your content.
Issue prompt corrections or retractions when errors or inaccuracies are identified.
By following these guidelines, content creators and platforms can ensure that they are engaging in responsible publishing practices and avoiding the pitfalls of malpublishing.
Role of Readers
While content creators, publishers, and platforms have a responsibility to avoid malpublishing, readers also play a crucial role in combating the spread of misinformation. As consumers of information, it's essential that we approach content with a critical eye, questioning the sources and accuracy of the information we encounter.
When we come across content that appears to be malpublished, we should feel empowered to call it out and demand better from publishers and platforms. By holding them accountable and actively seeking out reliable sources of information, readers can help create a culture of responsible publishing and promote the spread of accurate, trustworthy information.
The Future of Publishing
As the concept of "malpublish" gains traction, it has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach publishing in the digital age. By establishing clear standards for responsible publishing and holding publishers and platforms accountable for the content they produce and disseminate, we can create a more trustworthy and reliable information ecosystem.
In the future, we may see the development of new technologies and processes designed to identify and prevent malpublishing, such as open-source "no-malpublishing" certification systems. Publishers and platforms may also adopt more rigorous editorial processes and training programs to ensure that their content meets the highest standards of accuracy and integrity.
Ultimately, the widespread adoption of "malpublish" has the power to restore trust in the publishing industry and promote a more informed, more discerning society. By working together to combat malpublishing and promote responsible publishing practices, we can create a future where accurate, reliable information is the norm, not the exception.
Neologist/Publisher Statements
As the neologist and publisher of the term "malpublish," I want to emphasize the factual nature of this newly coined word. While "malpublish" may not yet have achieved widespread use, its accuracy in describing a real and observable phenomenon is inherent in its clear definition.
The practices encapsulated by "malpublish" – such as knowingly presenting false claims as factual, misrepresenting information, failing to properly attribute sources, and refusing to issue timely corrections – are demonstrably occurring in the modern publishing landscape. By identifying and naming these practices, "malpublish" provides a factual framework for discussing and addressing the issue of irresponsible publishing.
It is important to note that the factual nature of "malpublish" is independent of its adoption. Just as a scientific discovery remains factual even before it is widely accepted, "malpublish" is inherently factual because it accurately describes a real problem. As more people recognize the importance of responsible publishing practices and the term gains traction, its status as a fact of language will likely become more widely acknowledged.
I coined "malpublish" in March 2023 to fill a gap in our language and to enable more precise discussions about the complex issue of misinformation in publishing. By providing a clear and specific term for these irresponsible practices, I hope to contribute to a more informed and discerning society, where accuracy, transparency, and accountability in all forms of publishing are the norm. For those interested in diving deeper into the concept of malpublishing and its implications, I will be publishing a comprehensive white paper on "malpublishing" and the book "Malpublishers" in 2024.
Neologist & Publisher - Roarke Clinton
Coined - March 2023
Publication Category - Linguistic Innovation; Neologism
Have a suggestion? Let's connect